Minnesota Alliance of Peacemakers is a Peace and Justice Organization based in Minneapolis, MN

HOME

Our Members

...becoming a Member

Online Action Tool

Calendar

MAP Story

Mission & Principles

Resource People

Opinion "Peaces"

Leadership

!UP-TO-DATE!
Military Postcards
AVAILABLE Here - Free for distribution

Google
 Web This Site

MAP President's Memo
Dick Bernard

Peace Sign in Minneapolis Window - January 2007PEACEs
By Dick Bernard, February 19, 2007

You may have to look a little carefully to see it (note photo), but there it is, on the picture window of a modest home in northeast Minneapolis MN: a Peace Symbol, silently witnessing to its neighborhood and all passersby.

Linda, who works at a neighborhood coffee house I frequent with a couple of friends every other Tuesday, told us about the symbol and its history in early January.  It is her home, and her personal witness to Peace.  It has attracted both kinds of attention: people who affirm its presence...and at least one unknown soul who felt it his (or her) duty to 'egg' it in the middle of winter (you can see the evidence just above and to the right of the peace symbol).

It is our tendency, perhaps our wish, to see dramatic breatkthroughs: an instant end to War; a rapid turning of our leadership from War-worshipping policies to sanity.

Peace Bumper DecalIt would be nice, of course, to see instant turnarounds, but the dramatic work is really one 'peace' at a time, like the symbol in the window; like the bumper sticker '24PEACE' I saw on a vehicle at Lake Tahoe last October; like the giant PEACE sign outside the Basilica of St. Mary in Minneapolis; the metallic PEACE symbol on the trunk of the car in front of me recently; like, like, like....  Every one of us must bear witness if we are to have any chance of turning the destructive Titanic of War and its related war economy away from the Iceberg which is ever more obviously signalling our collective death.

There are, also, the big dreams too, and last summer I was privileged to become one of the early participants in the brainchild of a University of South Florida professor, Dr. Michael Knox, whose proposal is for a Peace Memorial in the City of War Monuments, Washington DC.  We've had this on the home page of this website since last summer, but never really publicized it adequately. 

You can visit www.uspeacememorial.org and learn all about the Vision, and Dr. Knox's personal peace biography in the registry section.  Scrolling down you'll find my own offering, and Noam Chomsky's, and Concepcion (Connie) Picciotto (who, along with colleagues, has since 1981 kept a round-the-clock vigil for peace across the street from the White House in Washington DC).  And there are others as well, some whose names will be familiar to Minnesotans.  Joe Schwartzberg, Human Rights and Peace Store, MAP, Citizens for Global Solutions MN, First Unitarian Society, Network of Spiritual Progressives. 

How about you and yours becoming a contibuting partner, now, this winter?

Consider very strongly becoming a participating member of the Peace Memorial project (donations are tax deductible).  Register your organization as part of the Peace Registry.  Make it a point to share this information with others.

"Tall Oaks from little acorns grow" goes the saying...but every Tree needs water.  Let's help nurture this Oak Tree to Peace! 

It is easy to put off such tasks.  PEACE cannot wait.

Basilica of St. Mary - Painting by Emmy White
This painting, of the Basilica of St. Mary, Minneapolis, by Emmy White (© 2005), is the illustration for September, 2007, on the Basilica calendar.  It's a good reminder that September 21 is International Day of Peace. (click to see larger image - displayed here with permission from the artist)

 

 

 

Cindy Sheehan, and the Season for Nonviolence
By Dick Bernard, January 19, 2007

“I now believe that the potential destructiveness of modern weapons totally
rules out the possibility of war ever again achieving a negative good.  If we
assume that mankind has a right to survive, then we must find an
alternative to war and destruction.  In our day of space vehicles and
guided ballistic missiles, the choice is either nonviolence or nonexistence.”

Martin Luther King Jr, in Strength to Love, 1963

Coincidence brought the Minnesota Alliance of Peacemakers to invite Cindy Sheehan to address Minnesota-area peace advocates on January 30, and then, two months later, to learn about and strongly endorse the 10th annual international Season for Nonviolence.  The Season begins on January 30, the anniversary of the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi (1948), and ends on April 4, the anniversary of the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr (1968).

The two ideas came from separate individuals, at separate times.

I can think of no better coincidence than Cindy speaking here on the very day the Season for Nonviolence begins.  In the ultimate (and tragic) irony, Cindy’s son, Casey, was killed in Iraq on April 4, 2004, which is the last day of the Season, and the anniversary of Martin Luther King Jrs death in Memphis..

Some basics, first:

Cindy Sheehans official website is Gold Star Families for Peace, http://www.gsfp.org.  

The website which is the informal clearing house for the Season for Nonviolence is http://www.agnt.org, click on Season for Nonviolence. 

We will publicize local events and offerings on the MAP calendar at www.mapm.org.  

Gandhi and King and Nonviolence?  Even with heroes the issue of nonviolence is sometimes complex and one’s thinking evolves.

Who better to speak on the topic than MLK himself?

MLK spoke eloquently of the quandary in an early book of his which I recently (and coincidentally) dusted off and reread.

I first came across the book, Strength to Love, in the living room of an African-American man in Americus GA in about 1994.  It was a book of sermons given by King during his ministry to 1963.  I believe the book remains available today, and is well worth purchase. 

My hosts edition of the book was the one printed immediately after MLK’s assassination in 1968.  The book was originally published in June, 1963, when King was 34 years old, just a few months before the famous “I have a dream speech” on the Mall in Washington, August 28, 1963.  www.holidays.net/mlk/speech.htm.

The last chapter of the book, entitled “Pilgrimage to Nonviolence”, is a departure from the other 16, in that it is Kings personal narrative on his journey to embracing non-violence. 

Following is Dr. King’s early writing on Gandhi and Nonviolence 

From Strength to Love by Martin Luther King Jr © 1963 , Chapter 17:

“Then [in the early 1950s] I was introduced to the life and teachings of Mahatma Gandhi.  As I read his works I became deeply fascinated by his campaigns of nonviolent resistance.  The whole Gandhian concept of satyagraha (satya is truth which equals love and graha is force; satyagraha thus means truth-force or love-force) was profoundly significant to me.  As I delved deeper into the philosophy of Gandhi, my skepticism concerning the power of love gradually diminished and I came to see for the first time that the Christian doctrine of love, operating through the Gandhian method of nonviolence, is one of the most potent weapons available to an oppressed people in their struggle for freedom.  At that time, however, I acquired only an intellectual understanding and appreciation of the position, and I had no firm determination to organize it in a socially effective situation.

When I went to Montgomery, Alabama, as a pastor in 1954, I had not the slightest idea that I would later become involved in a crisis in which nonviolent resistance would be applicable.  After I had lived in the community about a year, the bus boycott began.  The Negro people of Montgomery, exhausted by the humiliating experiences that they had constantly faced on the buses, expressed in a massive act of noncooperation their determination to be free.  They came to see that it was ultimately more honorable to walk the streets in dignity than to ride the buses in humiliation.  At the beginning of the protest, the people called on me to serve as their spokesman.  In accepting this responsibility, my mind, consciously or unconsciously, was driven back to the Sermon on the Mount and the Gandhian method of nonviolent resistance.  This principle became the guiding light of our movement.  Christ furnished the spirit and motivation and Gandhi furnished the method.

The experience in Montgomery did more to clarify my thinking in regard to the question of nonviolence than all of the books that I had read.  As the days unfolded, I became more and more convinced of the power of nonviolence.  Nonviolence became more than a method to which I gave intellectual assent; it became a commitment to a way of life.  Many issues I had not cleared up intellectually concerning nonviolence were now resolved within the sphere of practical action.

My privilege of traveling to India had a great impact on me personally, for it was invigorating to see firsthand the amazing results of a nonviolent struggle to achieve independence.  The aftermath of hatred and bitterness that usually follows a violent campaign was found nowhere in India, and a mutual friendship, based on complete equality, existed between the Indian and British people within the Commonwealth.

I would not wish to give the impression that nonviolence will accomplish miracles overnight.  Men are not easily moved from their mental ruts or purged of their prejudiced and irrational feelings.  When the underprivileged demand freedom, the privileged at first react with bitterness and resistance.  Even when the demands are couched in nonviolent terms, the initial response is substantially the same.  I am sure that many of our white brothers in Montgomery and throughout the South are still bitter toward the Negro leaders, even though these leaders have sought to follow a way of love and nonviolence.  But the nonviolent approach does something to the hearts and souls of those committed to it.  It gives them new self-respect.  It calls up resources of strength and courage that they did not know they had.  Finally, it so stirs the conscience of the opponent that reconciliation becomes a reality.

III

More recently I have come to see the need for the method of nonviolence in international relations.  Although I was not yet convinced of its efficacy in conflicts between nations, I felt that while war could never be a positive good, it could serve as a negative good by preventing the spread and growth of an evil force. War, horrible as it is, might be preferable to surrender to a totalitarian system.  But I now believe that the potential destructiveness of modern weapons totally rules out the possibility of war ever again achieving a negative good.  If we assume that mankind has a right to survive, then we must find an alternative to war and destruction.  In our day of space vehicles and guided ballistic missiles, the choice is either nonviolence or nonexistence.

I am no doctrinaire pacifist, but I have tried to embrace a realistic pacifism which finds the pacifist position as the less evil in the circumstances.  I do not claim to be free from the moral dilemmas that the Christian nonpacifist confronts, but I am convinced that the church cannot be silent while mankind faces the threat of nuclear annihilation.  If the church is true to her mission, she must call for an end to the arms race….”

From  Strength to Love by Martin Luther King, Jr © Harper and Row, 1963.

(For Dr. Kings view of the war of his time, Vietnam, see this address from April 16, 1967:   http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/058.html)  

THREE POSTNOTES to today’s reader:

1.  Dr. King, in the segment quoted above, talks about “an oppressed people in their struggle for freedom.”

The Negroes in Birmingham in 1955, and African-Americans generally, were those ‘oppressed’ to which he referred.  I think it would be an easy transition for King to talk about todays U.S. insanity in Iraq, Afghanistan, and on and on and on, and apply his words squarely to the U.S. military men and women sent to those killing fields, even those who seem to willingly go ‘in the service of their country’, not fully understanding the real reasons, or what might be ahead for them.  Doubtless there were slaves who did not wish freedom, because of fears of the unknown…the same dynamic in general applies to those in service.

2.  There is discussion, and indeed there is sometimes perceptible tension, within the Peace community (and others) about not only strategy and tactics, but vocabulary as well.  Is being Anti-War the same as being Pro-Peace?  Can “against” and “for” be synonyms?  Where does nonviolence end, or does it have no boundary – either you’re not violent or you are?  Can a non-violent approach embrace feelings or expressions of anger?  Is there a purity test for an activist?  A pacifist?  Do we give grades from A to F for performance?  Do you always have to be Minnesota-nice?  Does any of this even matter? 

Even within MAPs 68 organizations there is ample evidence of this sometimes (and useful) tension. 

A good succinct description of this tension comes from a January 16, 2007, speech by Bill Moyers to the National Conference on Media Reform in Memphis http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/16/159222 when he said, about Media reform, but in effect to all of us in any part of the Peace and Justice movement, that “all too often, the greatest obstacle to reform is the reform movement itself.  Factions rise, fences are erected, jealousies mount, and the cause all of us believe in is lost in the shattered fragments of what once was a clear and compelling vision.”

Moyers words, in my opinion, could be said similarly to any activist community and represent a problem about which we need constantly to be aware and in conversation about..

3.  Finally, among King’s words, above, he says “[a]t the beginning of the [bus boycott] protest, the people called on me to serve as their spokesman.”

In that single sentence resides, in my opinion, one of the major quandaries of any movement, at any time in history, no less so our own.

We wait for somebody else to do the leading, to inspire, to sacrifice, for us, or for the cause.  Leading can be and often is a most ‘sticky wicket’, and we know this.  For Gandhi and for King, the reward for leadership was death by assassination, martyrdom while advancing a noble cause.

Cindy Sheehan is greeted, with very good reason, as a hero in today’s peace movement.  But we owe it to her, and to our society and to ourselves, to more actively become co-leaders in this urgent task of finding a better way than bombs, bullets, death and destruction…in the cause of Peace and Justice.

Cindy Sheehan’s program January 30 is has been titled “1 Person can make a difference”.

That “1 person” is each one of us, in any of a multitude of ways.

The ball is in OUR court.

Dick Bernard, president

MAP

 

More on Jesus Hurtado
by Dick Bernard, 12-04-06

Jesus Hurtado on December 3, 2006A few days ago I posted (below) comments about a memorable meeting Nov 21 with a man, Jesus Hurtado, who had participated in the 1989 Hunger Strike at the Cathedral of St. Paul.

Dec 3, we had a small (6 people) but excellent meeting with the man, Jesus Hurtado. It included one other of the other 1989 Hunger Strikers, Jerry Rau, and we had a rich discussion.

We agreed to reconvene on January 17, 2007, at St. Joan of Arc.

Jesus provided the Hunger Strikers Summary of their 19 day Strike at the St. Paul Cathedral. It is accessible here.

There are lessons to be learned from the 1989 Strike which apply directly to today’s Peace Movement. There is a serious need to take a new look at tactics and strategies to achieve attention toward Peace in this century.

At another meeting on Nuclear Non-Proliferation on Saturday, Dec 2, Steve Leeper of the World Conference of Mayors for Peace revealed a very stark difference in citizen response to the nuclear issue between the present day and a few years ago. He noted a recent march in New York City which the organizers proudly estimated at 40,000 participants, in contrast to a march on the same issue in 1982 which was estimated at 1,000,000 participants.

Mr. Leeper also noted that the traditional large NGO support for movements such as Mayors for Peace initiative seems to be eroding as these groups are having more difficulty sustaining themselves, much less helping others.  This, plus the financial needs for a professional campaign to call wider attention to the current nuclear proliferation crisis makes is necessary for more direct citizen action and financial participation.  (His group has 1500 mayors as members, representing hundreds of millions of people worldwide.)  Their website is www.2020visioncampaign.com.  The seeming immensity of Mayors for Peace does not translate into an adequately funded advocacy organization, since each mayor joins for minimal dues.  Citizen funding and activism becomes more and more essential to do any kind of adequate outreach programming.  Your help in making more mayors aware of this group is solicited.

Without my active knowledge, I was probably a tiny part of that anti-nuclear movement in 1982. My 1982 Thanksgiving/Christmas Reflection to family and friends noted that I had been at the Vietnam Memorial the weekend it was dedicated (mid-October), and then noted this as well: “I’m thankful also to have heard Dr. Helen Caldicott speak on “The Madness of Nuclear War” on November 6,. Thankful too for being able to see a film on the horrors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Even more thankful to be able to find and talk with persons who survived the horror of Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941, including some sailors who were on the USS Arizona – my Uncle Franks tomb – that fateful day. Thankful to be able to tell you about my feelings. Hoping that our tomorrows will be filled with peace.”

That reflection went to family and friend 24 years ago; Jesus Hurtado and his colleagues witnessed to the world about El Salvador 17 years ago. That was a generation ago.

Ours is a new generation, and we need to measure our efforts and their effectiveness against those of the past. We can’t be complacent or satisfied with what we are doing. World conditions are far worse now than then, and the time is passing quickly.

Our grandchildren need our witness for peace.

Jesus Hurtado
by Dick Bernard, 11-29-06

Monday evening before Thanksgiving 2006 the phone rang at my home, and a man introduced himself to me, and said he’d like to share with me a proposal about bringing the troops home from Iraq.

He sounded sincere, and I agreed to meet with him the next morning at Resource Center of the Americas.

Jesus Hurtado was his name, and when I got to the Resource Center, I met him: a neatly dressed articulate gentleman with a very noticeable Spanish accent.

He gave me his proposal (short form accessible here; and longer form here). I read it later, and it is a proposal not unlike millions of other proposals we have variously formulated in our heads: ideas about disengaging from an awful and unproductive conflict.

But the proposal was not the topic of our table talk that Tuesday morning, and not the main reason for highlighting this intense man who had once been in the Bolivian Army. .

Jesus had along with him a large album, full of newspaper clippings of a 20 day hunger strike at the Cathedral of St. Paul which began Thanksgiving Day, 1989. Jesus was one of eight people who went on their strike to protest the killings of Jesuit Priests in El Salvador, and to draw attention to atrocities there. As evidenced by the album and our conversation, the strike drew a large amount of attention then, though I have been unable to access information about it on the web. Those on strike, according to the St. Paul Pioneer Press of Dec 10, 1989, were Fr. Roy Bourgeois, Valerie Steffenson, Rodolfo Pivaral (Guatamalan), Jorge Montacinos, Rene Hurtado and Jorge Manjivar (all El Salvador), Jerry Rau, and Jesus Hurtado, a Bolivian.

At the conclusion of our conversation, and after reading his proposal, I felt that at the very least, Jesus deserved an opportunity to share his story, and his ideas about ending the Iraq War. Take a few moments to read his proposal, either short or long form, and stop over at Minneapolis’ St. Joan of Arc Catholic Church, Upper Room of the Parish Center, 1 p.m. on Sunday, December 3 to hear him tell his story and share his ideas. Sunday is the first Sunday of Advent, and this conversation will be a good beginning to the season.

(In his writing, Jesus describes himself as follows: “I am a Bolivian national by birth, and a U.S.A. citizen. I work as an electro-mechanic technician. Married. A father of a daughter and a son. In 1989, I was part of a 20-day hunger strike group at the St. Paul Cathedral, St. Paul Minnesota, with Father Roy Bourgeois and others to protest the conflict in El Salvador.”)

Jesus Hurtado Iraq War Proposal - Short Version - printable .pdf file (150Kb)

Jesus Hurtado Iraq War Proposal - Long Version - printable .pdf file (258Kb)

 

 

© Copyright 2002-06 Minnesota Alliance of Peacemakers  /   Last Updated March 7, 2007
Send website feedback or comments to Webcare at mapm.org

Minnesota Alliance of Peacemakers is a Peace and Justice Organization based in Minneapolis, MN